<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Tech Success - Latest Comments in Publishing For the Digital World, In the Digital World</title><link>http://techsuccess.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://techsuccess.disqus.com/publishing_for_the_digital_world_in_the_digital_world/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:24:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Publishing For the Digital World, In the Digital World</title><link>http://techsuccess.blogspot.com/2008/04/publishing-for-digital-world-in-digital.html#comment-391846</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Zach - agreed... which is why we'll send the printed copy to anyone who wants it, free of charge...  :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:24:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publishing For the Digital World, In the Digital World</title><link>http://techsuccess.blogspot.com/2008/04/publishing-for-digital-world-in-digital.html#comment-389013</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good points Paul.  I agree that there is a place for print in today's high-tech world.  But I think the market is smaller - today's reader, even one who prefers the print form, is not going to buy a paper copy of a magazine unless it is one of his very favorite magazines, because the info is free online, usually.  I will probably write a follow-up with more on this.   Nice blog, btw.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zachlandes</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:59:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publishing For the Digital World, In the Digital World</title><link>http://techsuccess.blogspot.com/2008/04/publishing-for-digital-world-in-digital.html#comment-385065</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Zach&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi and thanks for your interest in Nodalities Magazine; I hope you will subscribe so we can let you have each issue as it comes out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your comment on the appropriateness of a print version is certainly a valid one, and it's something we considered long and hard.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our Nodalities blog (&lt;a href="http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/)"&gt;http://blogs.talis.com/noda...&lt;/a&gt; is regularly updated, and I also blog on the topic for ZDNet at &lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/semantic-web/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.zdnet.com/semantic-web/"&gt;http://blogs.zdnet.com/sema...&lt;/a&gt; . Many of our staff have their own blogs that are routinely relevant to the topic, too... and we also publish regular podcasts at &lt;a href="http://www.talis.com/platform/podcasts/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.talis.com/platform/podcasts/"&gt;http://www.talis.com/platfo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Within this context of widely available digital content, we felt that there *was* a place for a print version of Nodalities Magazine, with identical content to its online counterpart at &lt;a href="http://www.talis.com/nodalities/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.talis.com/nodalities/"&gt;http://www.talis.com/nodali...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am writing from Beijing Airport, on my way home from this year's World Wide Web conference. This is a pretty connected bunch of people, but they still appreciated the ability of myself and my colleagues to follow up conversations and introductions with printed material.  Even today, there is *a* place for printed matter. It reaches different people than might follow blogs and podcasts, and it also proves useful - even for those who read some of the material elsewhere - to have something to skim through on the plane, the train, or in moments of downtime at their desk.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The print form will not supersede its online version; but we felt - and this week has validated that feeling - that there was value in a print run too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Miller</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:33:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>